Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > We had problems delivering the notifications to some stricter SMS-C due > to invalid encoding of the SM. The root cause was incorrect message > class of the SM. > The Kannel source code seemed to show that the message class is > always set to zero in the HTTP interface (sendsms) if not specified > (other interfaces behave differently). The coding / binary flag is > also set to zero by this interface by default (meaning 7-bit / > non-binary). [1] > > > I now consider sendsms an interface where the defaults are not > specified, so I think it would be best for Mbuni to pass coding and > mclass parameters, but perhaps it's cleaner to offer them as > configuration options? > > Anyway, I worked around this by removing "?" in: > octstr_format_append(m->sendsms_url, > (from && octstr_len(from) > 1) ? > "?username=%S&password=%S&from=%S" : > "?username=%S&password=%S", > user, > pass,from); > ... to be able to use: > sendsms-url = > http://XXX:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?coding=1&mclass=1&; > in mbuni.conf. > > > Bye, > > [1] I mentionned this to Kannel devel as it seems there's Kannel code > to correctly guess the appropriate coding and perhaps mclass depending > on the presence of an udh.
did someone of use "wise" guys respond on this? ;) What is the implication on this for Kannel itself? Stipe ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@mbuni.org http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org
