-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tere!
IMHO versioning like Ubuntu has breaks everything what versioning stands for and I personally despise it. Versions are ment to be incremental, eg one does not simply go from 10.2 to 10.9. It think that You should continue with [Semantic Versioning][1] like the most of software development world does. [1]:http://semver.org/ - -- Kõike head soovides Günter Kits On 20.03.2014 14:02, Jan Wagner wrote: > Am 20.03.14 12:49, schrieb Holger Weiß: >> * Jan Wagner <[email protected]> [2014-03-20 12:38]: >>> I`m proposing a new version scheme which could look like: >>> >>> <year>.<month>[.bugfixrelease] >>> >>> If you think this looks very familiar ... yes it`s used by >>> ubuntu and may others. >>> >>> What maybe the benefits of a complete different release >>> scheme: >>> >>> * there will probably no version number races between existing >>> forks (which is totally nonsense) * we can better identify, if >>> a plugin is from our fork or no - this might help when we get >>> bugreports/complaints, especially when forks are more >>> diversing on code base > >> As you know, we currently have X.Y.Z, where Z is incremented for >> bug fix releases, Y for backwards-compatible feature releases, >> and X for backwards-incompatible releases.¹ The new scheme >> wouldn't allow for distinguishing the latter two, but I could >> live with that. I'm fine with either scheme. > > In Debian they are using an epoch. > > We chould implement that with: > > X.<year>.<month>[.bugfixrelease] > > Where X stands for incompatible releases. > > No? :) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTKt45AAoJEFnfbS9fXrweGNUQAMDvmECCkbV404vHZlM6OJf+ hGaEvXzXo8+FzUcmEG0oFI7xVrcr9hRrB7jSgV9fynJ/7cELpiBg0msLpdnvxIci qVwT3VZwy8T2urt+0W+AGW+4CKHey7pUOOAif1ykemXcKf6SSnPG1VCfwxP3ETbB qm1Ne7mwFLV1quYuaFEjexHARcpnmOicMV2jajqtIhvtuw5St/dPKggsaYP7/oMX Ts5ZD0Yf/s0D0ZZ6AtPVSr9EOeDFM58nwp7Cavfctd8jmyLdw7ZKqBCrMC2rQ9L4 x8fZBwq83E3s4NRaUMCXtwFYFOBm/f3zUrAIS3tV16kpmq768bkeO16iIEmFZMWR WC3z8gUkwWTKDySXd/iibTPcewq6h8IlVlCRTVOncs+AbhC0U3CegOxwl2isyuPq PIzHXYZi7XB5He08J99tdgP/6UkctXJsRsYca+bj9loh16IaAYP9DLOn3hBGEDYL oVWUGLpViV3TUSIRQQpDnbne11NYMkWOm2hKLflMQ99xxkEDsJneFYzamQ6wdW1G wMrwic1VXJ9PuE46ASoSFc1O/D/3p4j908VvwnyfvDz9CPQdcgSzeeVmPhT4kkui 8UVf+PxtX7dNQYpSrQdhVPyk0gfdQeWJIudzvCXCsNF8G8aUj5ZjnI6NLPXdFvbT Opq5jTwLcC5j/vhwdlo0 =4Sq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
