Yo Hal! On Wed, 04 May 2016 01:04:14 -0700 Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> > and still USB 1.1:
>
> That's unlikely to change.
>
> It's a hack that lets them use thinner cable. The signaling is
> slower so they don't need as much shielding to pass EMI.
>
> Compare the size of the cable on a typical USB GPS mouse with a
> typical real USB cable.
I can understand why the mainstream is using the cheapest option. I
bemoan the fact that few companies are serving the premium market.
The few, like navspark, that have High Speed USB, do not connect the
PPS. Why can't we convince companies to tie the PPS pins to DCD? They
are all afraid they'll break something.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
pgpdI1BoeyMjg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
