On 06/07/2016 07:26 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Mike <bellyac...@gmail.com>:
Looking at the timeservice init script after seeing that ntpd has a PID
value lower than gpsd it looks like their startup order is reversed.
Patch attached...
I'm not objecting to the patch per se, but what makes the order reversed?
It doesn't seem like either daemon ought to care much.
Eric,
What started me down this path is Gary's ntp.conf and comments therein.
Also nearly every thing to read out there on gpsd and ntp, says start
gpsd first.
I'm not saying either way is right or wrong. Logically in this case
where we know we want gpsd to feed ntpd it just makes the most sense to me.
Mike
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
