strom...@nexgo.de said: > I think that's still perpetuating a mistake. This whole business of having > to specify two servers (or refclocks) for the same thing should go away.
There is a fundamental issue. With a PPS, there really are two sources of time. Internally, ntpd needs two different handles so you can see both sets of info on ntpq -peers and clockstats. Normally, each PPS has an associated serial stream. It would be good if there were a clean way to specify that rather than using the prefer kludge. strom...@nexgo.de said: > It's easy enough these days to tell udev what each device should be named, > so in principle there wouldn't even be a need to use anything but the > default names. Is there a udev equivalent on other OSes? I don't think it is necessary. A boot time script can setup symbolic links. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
