On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> The new refclock directive is implemented and documented. This has > had some large consequences. > > Great! I'll echo Hal on the desirability to be less specific when we can. I think we should try to have the options be as descriptive as possible. Candidates I would expect are delay, offset, mode, and edge. These may require inconsistent mapping from Classic, but that update is required anyway and should only happen once. Clark Wierda
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
