Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> >> As I understand things, the recent problem for TESTFRAME was the overlap
> >> between adjtimex and ntp_adjtime.
> > Not quite. It's the fact that with KERNEL_PLL enabled, the capture files
> > will have an event in the stream that won't replay properly on a
> > non-KERNEL_PLL system, and vice-versa - the code path through replay will be
> > incompatibly different.
>
> Even without OS X, I think TESTFRAME would be worth more effort. It would
> cover Linux, NetBSD, FreeBSD. That would cover new OS/distro releases with
> new tool chains as well as 32 vs 64 and Intel vs ARM.
Process the logfile-brittleness issue, then tell me what you think.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
