Yo Hal! On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:07:14 -0700 Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] said: > > Unhandled option. Looks like it has been broken a really long > > time. I went way back and don't see it ever worked in NTPsec. > > It works. How would you know? ntp:ntp is the default, right? > There are two passes for the command line stuff. -u is handled on > the other one. > > I don't know why there are two. There is a comment about > initializing the library. Gack, fixing that would be a good project for someone. > How did that get past your testing? It did not, you caught it just fine. :-) I went over the option string: 46c:dD:f:gGhi:I:k:l:LmnNp:PqRs:t:u:U:Vw:xzZ The switch statements we are talking about handles 'b' and 'r' which are not in the option string?? What did they used to do? I added the 'u'. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 [email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpACfmbzPe9c.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
