On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:47:42PM -0700, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: > Yo Hal! > > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 01:37:30 -0700 > Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > > > Got a workaround? > > > > This seems to build and check: > > #include <math.h> /* ldexpl() */ > > #ifndef ldexpl > > /* Missing in NetBSD 6.1.5 */ > > #define ldexpl ldexp > > #endif > > > > Will that do the right conversions between double and long double? > > Serious loss of precision, but maybe the best we can do. > > > Do we want to work with old but still supported NetBSD or be sticky > > about requiring C99? > > You brougth it up. If yuo don't care we can drop that version of NetBSD.
ldexpl() was added in NetBSD 7 (released Sept 2015). NetBSD 6 was released in Oct 2012 and last had a point release in Sept 2014). NetBSD 6 is still supported by upstream per https://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal.html#history NetBSD 8 is in beta and no release date has been announced yet. I would expect NetBSD 6 support to be dropped when NetBSD 8 comes out. Do we need to support NetBSD 6 given it's age and lack of complete c99 support? Thanks, -Matt _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
