Eric S. Raymond via devel writes: > I'd prefer to go to an accelerated 1.1
So what exactly do you mean by "accelerated"? > The main reason is that there isn't just one ntpq fix. There have been a > whole bunch of small but user-visible and irritating bugs in ntpq > reporting since 1.0 - we had Hans Mayer from Austria reporting one > every couple days for a while. You could cherry-pick those commits that fix the user-facing bugs and release that as an interim or even quick-fix. Exactly how you're going to release the next few versions will be how the distro folks are going to see ntpsec for a long time, so I'd think it pays in the long run to be careful now. BTW, as I see development from the outside I'd suggest to use a release branch for the minor releases and commit all clear bug fixes there (merged back to master) rather than the current mixture of features, bug-fixes and clean-ups all in the same branch. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel