Yo MLewis! On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:17:06 -0400 MLewis via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> You don't need a precise
> Pi interrupt, you don't even need any Pi interrupt. The precision is
> in obtaining the kernel timestamp and the timemark.
No need to keep repeating what we already agree on. Time to move onto
what we can determine experimentally.
> I'm wanting numbers.
We all do! As soon as you have any LKM patches against the RasPi
4.14 kernel I'll test them.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpwVsb2Qm9jv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
