Yo Hal! On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:47:47 -0700 Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> > ./waf configure --out=$DIR $2 2>&1 | tee $DIR/test.log
> > The scripts run something (./waf configure in this case), and put
> > the output into a pipe to log it.
>
> > Then next, there is a need to see if any part of the pipeling
> > failed. But / bin/sh on *BSD only reports if the last part of the
> > pipeline failed. tee rarely fails.
>
> > "set -o pipefail" is supposed to return fail to $? if any part of
> > the pipeline failed.
>
> > Any ideas how to do that?
>
> Can we do what we need with ()s?
I have no idea. I have not used anything but bash for decades. But
it looks promising. If you can test then you or I can change the code.
> That doesn't test the tee step, but the old bash code didn't do that
> either.
Yup.
> PS: The bash version didn't work on NetBSD or FreeBSD either.
Yup. That is why I felt OK to change it. I was not worried about
breaking something already broken.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpvzo5KwVEph.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
