James Browning via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> And while I also like removing code, we've removed a lot, and I'm not
> > instantly adverse to giving the hobbyests a command option to handle
> > wraparound on their old hardware.
>
> In that case, I would like to suggest the affixes g and G (or f) be
> reserved for 10 and 13-bit week
> GPS era rollovers in time1 . Typing in multiples of 619315200 would be
> problematic unless
> I missed some zeros in which case it is worse. hah.
That's...not a terrible idea, actually. Do you think you could
implement it, or would it fall to me?
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
