Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>: > > e...@thyrsus.com said: > > Aaarrgghhh. It;s a huge pain in the ass and I wish it weren't interesting. > > But given our mission statememnnt, it has to be. > > Just to make sure we are on the same wavelength... > > My question/proposal was not to drop seccomp if we didn't do what I sketched > out. It was to allow a slightly tighter/cleaner list of syscalls if you were > willing to put in the work to collect the data. The old merger of all > syscalls ever seen on any system approach would still be the default if you > enabled seccomp and didn't specify your own list.
Understood. Now I'm torn between devel/ and contrib/. Use your judgment. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel