On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:40 PM Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > > On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > >> There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the > >> buzzword. I > >> haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then tweak > >> the > >> protocol a bit so you can send that on the next packet. > > > Daniel discovered it was broken and removed it from the protcol machine. > > Broken implementation or broken design? If the latter, is the current > IETF proposal (wherever that is) still broken?
It was a completely broken implementation of a seriously flawed design. See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/u5D_-IIeFVnj2j_PMvbW-48nd8Y/ for my critique of the proposed standard. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
