On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 04:57 +0930, Dan Shearer wrote: > Top posting is horrible :-) > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:06:06PM +0200, Julien Kerihuel wrote: > > MAPI_RETVAL_IF was introduced for convenience and has been extended to > > tools while it should had been kept within libmapi code only - It is > > anyway located in public header files. > > > > Maybe should we consider adding a set of defines and macros for > > developer usage. > > Samba has --enable-developer , maybe OC should too?
Sounds good. If you can propose a model that sounds OK, I'll take it. > Yes. I think OC should have its own debug.c/h rather than using Samba > although to start with just copying Samba would be fine. I think we should first define a policy about debugging messages and their associated levels. Maybe Samba's one? -- Julien Kerihuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenChange Project Manager GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
