Thanks Suman!

Hmm, confusing....  I'm still stuck with calendar items vanishing.  They do not vanish from the Outlook Today view.... only from the Calendar view.   Really rather odd...  Will see what I can find out.

Thanks again!,
Gary

Suman Manjunath wrote:
Hi Gary, everyone..

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Gary Rigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
 Hi Group,

 Has anyone experienced problems with disappearing appointments?  I'm
getting reports that items appear on the Outlook Today and briefly on the
calendar but then disappear.

 Looking via fetch-items, I'm seeing some subtle differences....

 |== Created via Outlook ==| : D638F80100000004/230B9B3F00000005
         Location: Somewhere
         Start time     :   Mon Feb 18 00:00:00 2008 GMT
         End time       :   Tue Feb 19 00:00:00 2008 GMT
         Timezone: (GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon,
London
         Private: False
         Status: Not Started
 |== Created via OpenChange ==| : D638F80100000004/ED73FACB01000001
         Location: Mars
         Start time     :   Mon Feb 18 18:00:00 2008 GMT
         End time       :   Mon Feb 18 22:35:00 2008 GMT
         Private: False
         Status: Completed

    

About the timezones, a.t.m, you cannot set timezones using
openchangeclient. And, what is displayed here is just a label (same in
Outlook). Internally, Exchange uses a different property altogether -
to identify timezone information. (Setting this property is quite a
task, since its no ID or a string-index, but a binary blob with some
weird structures within). This [1] is a pretty old list of values for
the same. I know that they altered/added a couple more with
Vista/Exchange 2007.

  
 And after some digging around stumbled on....

http://www.eggheadcafe.com/aspnet_answers/Exchange2000development/Aug2006/post27584610.asp

 An extra dt int parameter.  Ponder if this parameter needs to be sent?
    

I'm not too sure about this. For WebDAV, this parameter is probably
required (/me remembers reading about CDO instance types for handling
recurring appointments/tasks). For MAPI though, handling recurring
appointments/tasks is by using another binary blob. More here [2].
Bottomline: pure MAPI may not use this property.

  
 Cheers!,
 Gary
    

HTH
-Suman

[1] http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms912053.aspx
[2] http://www.geocities.com/cainrandom/dev/MAPIRecurrence.html
  


--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to