Reading RFC2617 I found that:
This directive is optional in order to
preserve backward compatibility with a minimal implementation of
RFC 2069 [6], but SHOULD be used if the server indicated that qop
is supported by providing a qop directive in the WWW-Authenticate
header field.
So, it is not a MUST to implement the qop even if the server indicate it.
I tried with the PSTN gateway we have to use and... it worked!
(we simply had to comment out in SER the generation of the error if the
qop is found in the request)
So, we are no longer in a hurry to implement this functionality...
Bye.
Elena Ramona Modroiu wrote:
Hi,
so soon I can not work on this issue. But please start implementing it
and I will help with a review once you submit it.
Ramona
Federico Giannici wrote:
Elena Ramona Modroiu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
I recently switched from SER to OpenSER primarily for the UAC module
functionalities. But now I found that the gateway where I have to
authenticate requires the qop funtionality, and this isn't curently
implemented in UAC... :-(
Is there any chance that is will be implemented in the near future?
It will be for sure there in the future, although there is no time
line settled yet. I have to find some free time ...
We need that functionality as soon as possible, so if you don't think
that you will have the time to work on it in a few days... I'll try to
do it.
But currently I haven't the necessary knowledge, so I don't know if I
will succeed...
Bye.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
Presidente del cda - NEOMEDIA srl
___________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
