HI Juha,
I sent some email about how to use the per-branch flags:
http://www.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2005-September/000515.html
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
> I hesitate to do it because you can get into BRANCH_ROUTE from a
> FAILURE_ROUTE - and add_rr_param() does not work inside a FAILURE_ROUTE
> (mainly due the static variable I mentioned before) - I need to work a
> bit on it.
ok, i didn't know that. it may then be better to wait until
add_rr_param can also be called from FAILURE_ROUTE.
> you mean flags per contact/branch after location lookup? we already have
> them.....
so if i test registrar/nat_flag in BRANCH_ROUTE, i correctly get the nat
status of that branch?
> I see no problems (conflicts or duplicity) with the patch, so I guess is
> ok to commit it.
it looks nicer in the code if i don't need to first call add_rr_param,
but i don't think it is necessary to apply the patch if there is no
performance advantage over first calling add_rr_param.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
