another question :-) ,
so shall we rename the old branches and tags to reflect the new naming
schema?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/12/07 12:06, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Am Montag, 12. März 2007 11:01 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
This is also how asterisk does it and I'm fine with it. IMO it makes
sense to not have a "patch version number" in the branch name.
btw: why not using "." instead of "_", e.g.
Nevertheless we should also have tags for each release.
As tags and branches are simply cheap copies in subversion, i second this
option.
1.2 for the branch, 1.2.0 - 1.2.N for the release tags.
Best regards,
Henning
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
