Hi Ovidiu, Hi Daryl,
this functionality was discussed for a long time and I agree with you it
is useful - I also felt the need for it couple of times ;).
what I suggest is the following:
- via configuration you can define sets of rtpproxys (multiple sets)
- from script, you can specify the set to be used; nathelper will
perform LB inside that set.
by this, we preserve the LB functionality and achieve more control also.
does this sounds reasonable to you?
regards,
bogdan
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hi Daryl,
That would be nice. If you do it, make sure that you don't restrict
to one rtpproxy server.
Allow the script to use a list of rtpproxy servers (good for
redundancy/failover).
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 3/23/07, Daryl Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I get some time I may try to modify the OpenSER nathelper module
to support this. It think it is important to have the ability to
choose the the rtpproxy server you wish to use (on the fly) with info
from an avp.
That way you can let your users choose the rtpproxy nearest to them. I
understand the SER version of nathelper already has this
functionality.
- Daryl
On 3/23/07, Ovidiu Sas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, there weren't any more discussion on this.
> As Bogdan pointed out, the nathelper module is able to manage multiple
> instances of rtpproxy and provide failover. It works quite nicely.
>
> But any enhancements would be welcomed :)
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 3/23/07, Daryl Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has there been any more discussion on this? If we could store
> > rtpproxy_sock param as an avp wouldn't we then be able to change the
> > value on the fly?
> >
> > This would be a tremendously useful feature as we'd be able to
select
> > the specific rtpproxy we want to use.
> >
> > - Daryl
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/07, Ovidiu Sas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Bogdan,
> > >
> > > Thx for pointing me out.
> > > I guess I should re-read the doc from time to time before
asking :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ovidiu
> > >
> > > On 2/8/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Ovidiu,
> > > >
> > > > afaik, nathelper already has support for multiple rtpproxy and
> > > > balancing. You cannot control the selection algorithm, but
you can
> > > > distribute the load to several rtpproxy-s.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > bogdan
> > > >
> > > > Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be nice to have the ability to store the
> > > > > rtpproxy_sock param as an avp (just like the
fr_inv_timer_avp). This
> > > > > will allow one to loadbalance rtp streams via several rtpproxy
> > > > > servers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ovidiu Sas
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devel mailing list
> > > > > Devel@openser.org
> > > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel@openser.org
> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
