Hello,
On 07/13/07 16:20, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello all,
Ovidiu Sas and i noticed during a discussion that there is a inconsistency
between the old dbtext infrastructure scripts "sc.dbtext" and "textdb.sh".
sc.dbtext creates the tables without a "id(int,auto) field, textdb.sh (and
the new infrastructure in svn trunk) add this field.
The new openserctl script (patch from Ovidiu, recently merged) don't work at
the moment because of this mismatch.
So my question is:
What is the right behaviour? Are these fields necessary? Are there evaluated
in the dbtext module?
the field is not in used by most of the modules. The auto-increment
column was added mainly to help additional tools and have the primary
key on an integer (faster db operations). If I am not wrong, msilo's
table has been updated to use this column instead of old one.
However, the id should be created to maintain consistency between table
definitions across DB engines.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks,
Henning
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
