On Thursday 18 October 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Dan Pascu writes: > > > it would be ok for me to list the installed tables in openserctlrc > > > file. the default could be all. > > > > That would be fine as it will be a consistent unique list of tables > > that are used by any operation on the database. > > But the split with standard/extra/presence only complicates > > management. The fact that you have to answer a question from the > > script and then also add some HAS_EXTRA/HAS_PRESENCE variable to > > openserctlrc to help it deal with it later, makes it confusing. > > i agree that the split is not a good idea. in above i actually didn't > mean listing tables but listing modules each of which would have its > own module-create.sql script.
I think that is well clear, even though the proper terminology was not used. I do not believe anyone would want to install individual tables, even more considering that this won't work as the module needs all its tables. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
