Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Maybe not wireless, but bonding, briding, vlan, etun, possibly more.
[if I understand you correctly] I agree. With ethtool, the idea is to
have a single tool that supports multiple hardware platforms -- even to
the point of introducing hardware-specific code into ethtool.
While I agree with wireless-dev that wireless /needs/ a separate tool,
for things like bridging and vlan it would certainly be nice to mitigate
the tool count explosion.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
