Pavel Emelianov wrote: > The set of functions process_session, task_session, process_group > and task_pgrp is confusing, as the names can be mixed with each other > when looking at the code for a long time. > > The proposals are to > * equip the functions that return the integer with _nr suffix to > represent that fact, > * and to make all functions work with task (not process) by making > the common prefix of the same name. > > For monotony the routines signal_session() and set_signal_session() > are replaced with task_session_nr() and set_task_session(), especially > since they are only used with the explicit task->signal dereference. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think we all agreed on this one. Can you send it to lkml@ as a candidate for -mm ? Thanks, C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
