On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:53:34 +0530 Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > > >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr) > > >+#endif > > > > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller? > > *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names > would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO! > > Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. > objection ;) "cpuctlr" isn't memorable. Kernel code is write-rarely, read-often. "cpu_controller", please. The extra typing is worth it ;) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
