> I think you and Eric (and I) are disagreeing about those limitations. > You take it for granted that a sibling pidns is off limits for signals. > But the signal wasn't sent using a pid, but using a file (in SIGIO > case). So since the fs was shared, the signal should be sent. An > event happened, and the receiver wants to know about it.
seen that way I agree. si_code is set to SI_MESGQ, but what do we put in si_pid ? 0 ? we could use the si_errno to pass extra info, like the sending process lives in a // world ... C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
