[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/4]: Enable multiple mounts of /dev/pts
> 
> To support multiple PTY namespaces, we should be allow multiple mounts of
> /dev/pts, once within each PTY namespace.
> 
> This patch removes the get_sb_single() in devpts_get_sb() and uses test and
> set sb interfaces to allow remounting /dev/pts.  The patch also removes the
> globals, 'devpts_root' and uses current_pts_mnt() to access 'devpts_mnt'
> 
> Changelog:
>       - Version 0: Based on earlier versions from Serge Hallyn and
>         Matt Helsley.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  fs/devpts/inode.c |  120 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24/fs/devpts/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.orig/fs/devpts/inode.c       2008-02-05 17:30:52.000000000 
> -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24/fs/devpts/inode.c    2008-02-05 19:16:39.000000000 -0800
> @@ -34,7 +34,10 @@ static inline struct idr *current_pts_ns
>  }
>  
>  static struct vfsmount *devpts_mnt;
> -static struct dentry *devpts_root;
> +static inline struct vfsmount *current_pts_ns_mnt(void)
> +{
> +     return devpts_mnt;
> +}
>  
>  static struct {
>       int setuid;
> @@ -130,7 +133,7 @@ devpts_fill_super(struct super_block *s,
>       inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
>       inode->i_nlink = 2;
>  
> -     devpts_root = s->s_root = d_alloc_root(inode);
> +     s->s_root = d_alloc_root(inode);
>       if (s->s_root)
>               return 0;
>       
> @@ -140,10 +143,53 @@ fail:
>       return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * We use test and set super-block operations to help determine whether we
> + * need a new super-block for this namespace. get_sb() walks the list of
> + * existing devpts supers, comparing them with the @data ptr. Since we
> + * passed 'current's namespace as the @data pointer we can compare the
> + * namespace pointer in the super-block's 's_fs_info'.  If the test is
> + * TRUE then get_sb() returns a new active reference to the super block.
> + * Otherwise, it helps us build an active reference to a new one.
> + */
> +
> +static int devpts_test_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
> +{
> +     return sb->s_fs_info == data;
> +}
> +
> +static int devpts_set_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
> +{
> +     sb->s_fs_info = data;
> +     return set_anon_super(sb, NULL);
> +}
> +
>  static int devpts_get_sb(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
>       int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data, struct vfsmount *mnt)
>  {
> -     return get_sb_single(fs_type, flags, data, devpts_fill_super, mnt);
> +     struct super_block *sb;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     /* hereafter we're very simlar to get_sb_nodev */
> +     sb = sget(fs_type, devpts_test_sb, devpts_set_sb, data);
> +     if (IS_ERR(sb))
> +             return PTR_ERR(sb);
> +
> +     if (sb->s_root)
> +             return simple_set_mnt(mnt, sb);
> +
> +     sb->s_flags = flags;
> +     err = devpts_fill_super(sb, data, flags & MS_SILENT ? 1 : 0);
> +     if (err) {
> +             up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +             deactivate_super(sb);
> +             return err;
> +     }
> +

That stuff becomes very very similar to that in proc :)
Makes sense to consolidate. Maybe...

> +     sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE;
> +     devpts_mnt = mnt;
> +
> +     return simple_set_mnt(mnt, sb);
>  }
>  
>  static struct file_system_type devpts_fs_type = {
> @@ -158,10 +204,9 @@ static struct file_system_type devpts_fs
>   * to the System V naming convention
>   */
>  
> -static struct dentry *get_node(int num)
> +static struct dentry *get_node(struct dentry *root, int num)
>  {
>       char s[12];
> -     struct dentry *root = devpts_root;
>       mutex_lock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
>       return lookup_one_len(s, root, sprintf(s, "%d", num));
>  }
> @@ -207,12 +252,28 @@ int devpts_pty_new(struct tty_struct *tt
>       struct tty_driver *driver = tty->driver;
>       dev_t device = MKDEV(driver->major, driver->minor_start+number);
>       struct dentry *dentry;
> -     struct inode *inode = new_inode(devpts_mnt->mnt_sb);
> +     struct dentry *root;
> +     struct vfsmount *mnt;
> +     struct inode *inode;
> +
>  
>       /* We're supposed to be given the slave end of a pty */
>       BUG_ON(driver->type != TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY);
>       BUG_ON(driver->subtype != PTY_TYPE_SLAVE);
>  
> +     mnt = current_pts_ns_mnt();
> +     if (!mnt)
> +             return -ENOSYS;
> +     root = mnt->mnt_root;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
> +     inode = idr_find(current_pts_ns_allocated_ptys(), number);
> +     mutex_unlock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
> +
> +     if (inode && !IS_ERR(inode))
> +             return -EEXIST;
> +
> +     inode = new_inode(mnt->mnt_sb);
>       if (!inode)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -222,23 +283,31 @@ int devpts_pty_new(struct tty_struct *tt
>       inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
>       init_special_inode(inode, S_IFCHR|config.mode, device);
>       inode->i_private = tty;
> +     idr_replace(current_pts_ns_allocated_ptys(), inode, number);
>  
> -     dentry = get_node(number);
> +     dentry = get_node(root, number);
>       if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && !dentry->d_inode) {
>               d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> -             fsnotify_create(devpts_root->d_inode, dentry);
> +             fsnotify_create(root->d_inode, dentry);
>       }
>  
> -     mutex_unlock(&devpts_root->d_inode->i_mutex);
> +     mutex_unlock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
>  struct tty_struct *devpts_get_tty(int number)
>  {
> -     struct dentry *dentry = get_node(number);
> +     struct vfsmount *mnt;
> +     struct dentry *dentry;
>       struct tty_struct *tty;
>  
> +     mnt = current_pts_ns_mnt();
> +     if (!mnt)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     dentry = get_node(mnt->mnt_root, number);
> +
>       tty = NULL;
>       if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
>               if (dentry->d_inode)
> @@ -246,14 +315,21 @@ struct tty_struct *devpts_get_tty(int nu
>               dput(dentry);
>       }
>  
> -     mutex_unlock(&devpts_root->d_inode->i_mutex);
> +     mutex_unlock(&mnt->mnt_root->d_inode->i_mutex);
>  
>       return tty;
>  }
>  
>  void devpts_pty_kill(int number)
>  {
> -     struct dentry *dentry = get_node(number);
> +     struct dentry *dentry;
> +     struct dentry *root;
> +     struct vfsmount *mnt;
> +
> +     mnt = current_pts_ns_mnt();
> +     root = mnt->mnt_root;
> +
> +     dentry = get_node(root, number);
>  
>       if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
>               struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> @@ -264,17 +340,23 @@ void devpts_pty_kill(int number)
>               }
>               dput(dentry);
>       }
> -     mutex_unlock(&devpts_root->d_inode->i_mutex);
> +     mutex_unlock(&root->d_inode->i_mutex);
>  }
>  
>  static int __init init_devpts_fs(void)
>  {
> -     int err = register_filesystem(&devpts_fs_type);
> -     if (!err) {
> -             devpts_mnt = kern_mount(&devpts_fs_type);
> -             if (IS_ERR(devpts_mnt))
> -                     err = PTR_ERR(devpts_mnt);
> -     }
> +     struct vfsmount *mnt;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     err = register_filesystem(&devpts_fs_type);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     mnt = kern_mount_data(&devpts_fs_type, NULL);
> +     if (IS_ERR(mnt))
> +             err = PTR_ERR(mnt);
> +     else
> +             devpts_mnt = mnt;
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to