Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase
>> > - do you have some candidates in mind?
>>
>> Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was
>> the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I
>> actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support.
>>
>
> One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful
> would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and
> reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks.
>
> Paul
Yes, I remember this. This feature would be extremely useful.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
