[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> If you're going to make it a 64-bit pass it in as a 64-bit number, instead >> of breaking it into two numbers. > > Maybe I am missing your point. The glibc interface could take a 64bit > parameter, but don't we need to pass 32-bit values into the system call > on 32 bit systems ?
Not as such, no. The ABI handles that. To make the ABI clean on some architectures, it's good to consider a 64-bit value only in positions where they map to an even:odd register pair once slotted in. > Yes, this was discussed before in the context of Pavel Emelyanov's patch > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/16/109 > > along with sys_indirect(). While there was no consensus, it looked like > adding a new system call was better than open ended interfaces. That's not really an open-ended interface, it's just an expandable bitmap. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
