Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> static inline void >>> -nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event, >>> +nf_conntrack_event_cache(struct net *net, enum ip_conntrack_events event, >>> const struct sk_buff *skb) >>> { >> Passing the conntrack instead of the struct net and the skb >> would probably keep the callers cleaner. > > Dunno, passing netns explicitly like saying conntrack event happened in > netns A, which is reasonable. OTOH, s/skb/ct/ is indeed nicer. > > I'll change it as you suggest and see what happens. > > BTW, I asked earlier if untracked conntracks are ever supposed to drop into > event cache. If they're, trimming nf_conntrack_untracked is out of question.
No, they are skipped by the only event handler, ctnetlink. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel