Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:21:44PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote: >> Network devices from sub-network namespaces appear in sysfs >> with a name that looks like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> eg: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > How does the default udev rules as shipped by most distros handle the > renaming of the network device if the MAC address is duplicated like it > will be for these eth devices?
The mac address is not duplicated. Further devices like [EMAIL PROTECTED] are completely unusable to the udev rules in the initial network namespace because they can not talk to or affect them. As I read it Ben's ``solution'' puts entries in sysfs that are completely unusable to udev. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
