KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:07:18 +0900 (JST)
> Hirokazu Takahashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Hi Ryo,
>>>
>>> The page_cgroup seems to be stable in the latest kernel.
>>> I'd like to know whether you have a plan or schedule to release
>>> a new version of bio-cgroup against latest kernel.
>> I have a plan on doing this.
>>
>> I thought I would start to implement it once the implementation of
>> memory cgroup got almost done. If you say the code of page_cgroup is
>> fixed, I'll start it from now on. I guess it'll be done in two weeks.
>>
>
> code to page_cgroup itself will not be changed. (I hope)
> possible change will be
> - new flags
> - support to SwapCache
> - swap_cgroup support (will be done independenly from page_cgroup.)
>
> API of
> lookup_page_cgroup()
> lock_page_cgroup()
> PCG_USED bit
>
> will not change, I think.
I think you should not wait for stabilization, rather build on mmotm (-mm). Use
it and complain if it changes too often or becomes unusable for you.
--
Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
