On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:01 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > if (ctx->dump_live) > down_read(&uts_sem); > strncpy(i->sysname, (const char *)uts_ns->name.sysname, 64); > strncpy(i->nodename, (const char *)uts_ns->name.nodename, 64); > strncpy(i->release, (const char *)uts_ns->name.release, 64); > strncpy(i->version, (const char *)uts_ns->name.version, 64); > strncpy(i->machine, (const char *)uts_ns->name.machine, 64); > strncpy(i->domainname, (const char *)uts_ns->name.domainname, > 64); > if (ctx->dump_live) > up_read(&uts_sem);
Doesn't this turn a minor bug (like a task getting accidentally unfrozen) into a oopsable bug? I mean, doing this without a lock is nice and all, but it adds code to make it selectable. What's the purpose of avoiding the semaphore anyway? Performance? -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
