On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Xiaotian Feng<df...@redhat.com> wrote: > In cgroup_get_sb, the lock sequence is: > mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); > mutex_lock(&cgroup->mutex); > so the last unlock sequence should be:
Make this "so for consistency the last ..." ? Maybe make the patch title "Make unlock sequence in cgroup_get_sb consistent" so someone looking through the change logs for fixes to backport doesn't wrongly thing that this fixes any bug"? > mutex_unlock(&cgroup->mutex); > mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); > > Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <df...@redhat.com> Acked-by: Paul Menage <men...@google.com> Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
