Quoting Dan Smith (da...@us.ibm.com): > OL> Unless/until we decide otherwise, let's keep all ckpt_hdr_xxx > OL> definitions in a single place -- checkpoint_hdr.h > > That's how I initially had it, but Serge asked for it to be moved into > the network headers. Serge?
Yes, it seems to me we want to keep those close to the maintainer's code rather than expect them to go browsing through cr headers when they change their own code. Of course just putting ckpt_hdr_xxx into the subsystems' headers isn't sufficient - we need to have better discussions with the maintainers about ways to make maintaining their subsystems with cr pretty much the same as it was without cr. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
