Quoting Dan Smith ([email protected]):
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <[email protected]>
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Compare against MAX_ERRNO instead of more stringent but obscure
> constant
> ---
> include/linux/checkpoint.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/checkpoint.h b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> index 60d1116..b2c86a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
> #include <linux/checkpoint_types.h>
> #include <linux/checkpoint_hdr.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/err.h>
>
> /* ckpt_ctx: kflags */
> #define CKPT_CTX_CHECKPOINT_BIT 0
> @@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ extern void *restore_sighand(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx);
> memcpy(LIVE, SAVE, count * sizeof(*SAVE)); \
> } while (0)
>
> +static inline int ckpt_validate_errno(int errno)
> +{
> + return (errno >= 0) && (errno < MAX_ERRNO);
> +}
Maybe i should take a break and re-read in a few minutes, but
don't you want this to be:
return (errno > 0) && (errno <= MAX_ERRNO));
>
> /* debugging flags */
> #define CKPT_DBASE 0x1 /* anything */
> --
> 1.6.2.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
