On 09/09/2009 11:03 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > C90 or C99 below should work. Is it ok to use a data structure that is > not in C89 ? >
C89 is the same as C90 (C89 refers to the ANSI standard, C90 to the ISO standard, but they're functionally identical.) > BTW, would it work if we defined > > struct pid_set { > u64 pids; > int num_pids; > } > > where ->pids can be still be a pointer ? The data structure would > have the same size on all architectures. > It would rather suck in terms of usability, though. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel