* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-10-27 09:03:11]:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:15:29 -0700
> Matt Helsley <matth...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > cgroup subsystems may find the O_APPEND and O_NONBLOCK flags useful
> > in determining the way they handle writes. For now only pass these
> > flags through the write_string op.
> >
> > A subsequent patch will make use of the O_NONBLOCK flag in the
> > cgroup freezer write_string op.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matth...@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Nathan Lynch <n...@pobox.com>
> > Cc: Paul Menage <men...@google.com>
> > Cc: Li Zefan <l...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > (Cc'ing mem controller maintainers in case they find this useful..)
> > Cc: Balbir Singh <bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xe...@openvz.org>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Hmm, maybe useful if we decided to add memory.drop_memory or some...
> But now, we have no plan to add backup thread(for asynchronous job).
> or some trylock ops.
> Anyway, no objection from me if you want this.
>
I see no issues as well, but no use at the moment right away.
--
Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
