Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> The pid namespace is enabled by default in different distros
> and the different bugs were fixed when they were reported.
> No new bug is reported since some time now, so I guess it's safe to
> remove the experimental condition on this subsystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@free.fr>

I'd say so.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <se...@us.ibm.com>

> ---
>  init/Kconfig |    7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/init/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> @@ -690,17 +690,14 @@ config USER_NS
>         If unsure, say N.
> 
>  config PID_NS
> -     bool "PID Namespaces (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +     bool "PID Namespaces"
>       default n
> -     depends on NAMESPACES && EXPERIMENTAL
> +     depends on NAMESPACES
>       help
>         Support process id namespaces.  This allows having multiple
>         processes with the same pid as long as they are in different
>         pid namespaces.  This is a building block of containers.
> 
> -       Unless you want to work with an experimental feature
> -       say N here.
> -
>  config NET_NS
>       bool "Network namespace"
>       default n
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to