Quoting Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca): > Hello Serge, > > Thanks for the small test, I do confirm > there is the same problem here with it, > as soon started the program use ALL available > CPU cycle (minus some few %) and NEVER > EVER come back from "clone" function. > The ONLY way I found to recover the > system is to power it down (sic!). > > See attachment, your program, the > .config file, and cpu information > (I put back your test too, (done > cosmetic changes only)). > > Once again, clone call on 2.6.32.3 > is working fine. > > Sorry to bother the list, I was "expecting" > a Stack size problem, but I increase > your value from 4 to 10, with the same result. > Hopefully it could be something I overlooked > with my Kernel config file, if someone > want to have a look I attached it. > > My guess for now it is something within > the clone code specific to i386. > > I 'll try to pin point within the > clone code. > > (could someone check tstclone.c under > i386 arch and confirm trouble?)
Also might echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq before running the test, then hit alt-sysrq-d to show all locks being held, alt-sysrq-l to show stacks, alt-sysrq-p to dump registers, and alt-sysrq-t to dump tasks. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
