SH> So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier thing SH> where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then SH> switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy.
Well, I think that would be hidden in the nicer helper function I think I'll need, which I eluded to in the patch header. This is just an RFC proof that it can be done in this manner, but I think a separate helper in nsproxy.c is in order to make it nice (and avoid the extra alloc/free of the netns that copy_namespaces() will create). Agreed? Thanks! -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
