This patch adds the shrinker interface to memcg proposed kmem
controller. With this, softlimits starts being meaningful. I didn't
played to much with softlimits itself, since it is a bit in progress
for the general case as well. But this patch at least makes vmscan.c
no longer skip shrink_slab for the memcg case.
It also allows us to set the hard limit to a lower value than
current usage, as it is possible for the current memcg: a reclaim
is carried on, and if we succeed in freeing enough of kernel memory,
we can lower the limit.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<[email protected]>
CC: Kirill A. Shutemov<[email protected]>
CC: Greg Thelen<[email protected]>
CC: Johannes Weiner<[email protected]>
CC: Michal Hocko<[email protected]>
CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<[email protected]>
CC: Paul Turner<[email protected]>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker<[email protected]>
CC: Pekka Enberg<[email protected]>
CC: Christoph Lameter<[email protected]>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 +++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 4 ++
mm/memcontrol.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/vmscan.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 6138d10..246b2d4 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -33,12 +33,16 @@ struct mm_struct;
struct memcg_kmem_cache {
struct kmem_cache *cache;
struct work_struct destroy;
+ struct list_head lru;
+ u32 nr_objects;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* Should be able to do without this */
};
struct memcg_cache_struct {
int index;
struct kmem_cache *cache;
+ int (*shrink_fn)(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc);
+ struct shrinker shrink;
};
enum memcg_cache_indexes {
@@ -53,6 +57,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *memcg_from_shrinker(struct shrinker *s);
struct memcg_kmem_cache *memcg_cache_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int index);
void register_memcg_cache(struct memcg_cache_struct *cache);
void memcg_slab_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cache, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+bool memcg_slab_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
struct kmem_cache *
kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *base);
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 07ceb97..11efdba 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_SHRINKER_H
#define _LINUX_SHRINKER_H
+struct mem_cgroup;
/*
* This struct is used to pass information from page reclaim to the shrinkers.
* We consolidate the values for easier extention later.
@@ -10,6 +11,7 @@ struct shrink_control {
/* How many slab objects shrinker() should scan and try to reclaim */
unsigned long nr_to_scan;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
};
/*
@@ -40,4 +42,6 @@ struct shrinker {
#define DEFAULT_SEEKS 2 /* A good number if you don't know better. */
extern void register_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
+
+extern void register_shrinker_memcg(struct shrinker *);
#endif
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1b1db88..9c89a3c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3460,6 +3460,54 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup
*memcg,
return ret;
}
+static int mem_cgroup_resize_kmem_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ unsigned long long val)
+{
+
+ int retry_count;
+ int ret = 0;
+ int children = mem_cgroup_count_children(memcg);
+ u64 curusage, oldusage;
+
+ struct shrink_control shrink = {
+ .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+ .memcg = memcg,
+ };
+
+ /*
+ * For keeping hierarchical_reclaim simple, how long we should retry
+ * is depends on callers. We set our retry-count to be function
+ * of # of children which we should visit in this loop.
+ */
+ retry_count = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES * children;
+
+ oldusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE);
+
+ while (retry_count) {
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ ret = -EINTR;
+ break;
+ }
+ mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
+ ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
+ mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
+
+ shrink_slab(&shrink, 0, 0);
+
+ curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE);
+
+ /* Usage is reduced ? */
+ if (curusage>= oldusage)
+ retry_count--;
+ else
+ oldusage = curusage;
+ }
+ return ret;
+
+}
+
static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long long val)
{
@@ -3895,13 +3943,17 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct
cftype *cft,
break;
if (type == _MEM)
ret = mem_cgroup_resize_limit(memcg, val);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
else if (type == _KMEM) {
if (!memcg->kmem_independent_accounting) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
- } else
+
+ ret = mem_cgroup_resize_kmem_limit(memcg, val);
+ }
+#endif
+ else
ret = mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(memcg, val);
break;
case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
@@ -5007,9 +5059,19 @@ struct memcg_kmem_cache *memcg_cache_get(struct
mem_cgroup *memcg, int index)
void register_memcg_cache(struct memcg_cache_struct *cache)
{
+ struct shrinker *shrink;
+
BUG_ON(kmem_avail_caches[cache->index]);
kmem_avail_caches[cache->index] = cache;
+ if (!kmem_avail_caches[cache->index]->shrink_fn)
+ return;
+
+ shrink =&kmem_avail_caches[cache->index]->shrink;
+ shrink->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+ shrink->shrink = kmem_avail_caches[cache->index]->shrink_fn;
+ shrink->batch = 1024;
+ register_shrinker_memcg(shrink);
}
#define memcg_kmem(memcg) \
@@ -5055,8 +5117,21 @@ int memcg_kmem_newpage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct
page *page, unsigned lon
{
unsigned long size = pages<< PAGE_SHIFT;
struct res_counter *fail;
+ int ret;
+ bool do_softlimit;
+
+ ret = res_counter_charge(memcg_kmem(memcg), size,&fail);
+ if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
+
+ do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
+ mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
+ if (unlikely(do_softlimit))
+ mem_cgroup_update_tree(memcg, page);
+ }
- return res_counter_charge(memcg_kmem(memcg), size,&fail);
+ return ret;
}
void memcg_kmem_freepage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page,
unsigned long pages)
@@ -5083,6 +5158,7 @@ void memcg_create_kmem_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
else
memcg->kmem_cache[i].cache = kmem_cache_dup(memcg,
cache);
INIT_WORK(&memcg->kmem_cache[i].destroy, memcg_cache_destroy);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->kmem_cache[i].lru);
memcg->kmem_cache[i].memcg = memcg;
}
}
@@ -5157,6 +5233,11 @@ free_out:
return ERR_PTR(error);
}
+bool memcg_slab_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return !memcg->kmem_independent_accounting;
+}
+
void memcg_slab_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cache, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
int i;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index c52b235..b9bceb6 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -159,6 +159,23 @@ long vm_total_pages; /* The total number of pages
which the VM controls */
static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
+/*
+ * If we could guarantee the root mem cgroup will always exist, we could just
+ * use the normal shrinker_list, and assume that the root memcg is passed
+ * as a parameter. But we're not quite there yet. Because of that, the shinkers
+ * from the memcg case can be different from the normal shrinker for the same
+ * object. This is not the ideal situation but is a step towards that.
+ *
+ * Also, not all caches will have their memcg version (also likely to change),
+ * so scanning the whole list is a waste.
+ *
+ * I am using, however, the same lock for both lists. Updates to it should
+ * be unfrequent, so I don't expect that to generate contention
+ */
+static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_memcg_list);
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
@@ -169,6 +186,11 @@ static bool scanning_global_lru(struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz)
{
return !mz->mem_cgroup;
}
+
+static bool global_slab_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !memcg_slab_reclaim(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
