On 08/10/2012 11:40 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Agreed on open() for sockets.. the lack of open is a Berklix derived
> pecularity of the interface. It would equally be useful to be able to
> open "/dev/socket/ipv4/1.2.3.4/1135" and the like for scripts and stuff
>
> That needs VFS changes however so you can pass the remainder of a path to
> a device node. It also lets you do a lot of other sane stuff like
>
> open /dev/ttyS0/9600/8n1
>
Well, supporting device node subpaths would be nice, but I don't think
that that is a requirement either for being able to open() a socket (as
a Linux extension) nor for supporting something like your above
/dev/socket/... since that could be done with a filesystem rather than
just a device node.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
