On Tue 21-08-12 13:40:45, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 08/21/2012 01:35 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > I am asking because this should trigger memcg-oom > > but that one will usually pick up something else than the fork bomb > > which would have a small memory footprint. But that needs to be handled > > on the oom level obviously. > > > Sure, but keep in mind that the main protection is against tasks *not* > in this memcg.
Yes and that's is good step forward. I just wanted to mention that we still have the problem inside the subhierarchy. The changelog was not specific enough. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
