On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, > > right? > > > > Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we > will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still > using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted.
Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next version? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
