On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 00:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 23:47 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > Not so good to me. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > > > > > And that should be either an Acked-by or a Reviewed-by. You can't sign > > > off on patches which have not been submitted or transported by you. > > > > I actually gave some input, provided a hash function, and so on. > > > > So this SOB was valid. I do that all the time. > > Not really. I recommend you to read the relevant file in Documentation > which covers what can have your SOB.
OK I did that again, and found this : The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. And I was involved in the development of the patch. I understand you dont like it at all, so I'll remember not trying to help anymore in this area. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
