On 12/18/2013 05:16 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -176,8 +176,9 @@ kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const 
> char *name, size_t size,
>       get_online_cpus();
>       mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>  
> -     if (!kmem_cache_sanity_check(memcg, name, size) == 0)
> -             goto out_locked;
> +     err = kmem_cache_sanity_check(memcg, name, size);
> +     if (err)
> +             goto out_unlock;
>  
>       /*
>        * Some allocators will constraint the set of valid flags to a subset

Theoretically in future kmem_cache_sanity_check() can return positive value.
Probably it's better to check (err < 0) in caller ?

Thank you,
        Vasily Averin
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to