On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:24:15PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:11:28PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > > > > Hmm, checkpatch still has max_line_length set to 80. Could you please > > share a link to this agreement? > > > > > fine. Wonder, do you really still sit on 80 chars terminal? > > > > I use a 12" laptop. With the window vertically split into two panes, I > > have only ~80 characters per each pane. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/3/101 > > One of the several conversations.
Fortunately, 80 column limit is still there. I've just checked that on my external 20" display, with the font size my eyes are used to, I can keep two panes of 104 columns max. So if they decided to switch to 100 column standard, even a huge 15" laptop wouldn't save me :-/ > > nb: you know, moving patches from mainline (slave lock) seems > to be not that simple, they introduced own new lock class for that. > at moment i think how to modify our vtty code without mangling > general tty code. I'd still suggest moving EXTRA_REF logic to tty_io.c. Yes, it's going to hurt a little during rebases, but if we try to keep it in pty.c we will implicitly rely on tty_io.c internal logic (locking or ref counting rules), which will probably result in failures at runtime, which is much worse than failures at build time. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
