After thinking for a minute, I would like to ask, why do we need it?
Both fuse_control_sb and fuse_conn_list belongs to "fusectl" file
system, while this patch virtualizes "fuse" one, which is enough for sshfs.
22.09.2015 17:38, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
I think we have to virtualize fuse_control_sb and fuse_conn_list
_before_ setting FS_VIRTUALIZED bit.
On 09/22/2015 06:28 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
From: Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbur...@parallels.com>
This is requred to allow to mount FUSE-based filesystems like SshFS.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-6498
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbur...@parallels.com>
---
fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index d29f9aa..4a1b46f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct
super_block *sb)
static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "fuse",
- .fs_flags = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
+ .fs_flags = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_VIRTUALIZED,
.mount = fuse_mount,
.kill_sb = fuse_kill_sb_anon,
};
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
